Georgetown University - Custom Software Development: Preregistration System

Project:
Customization and Implementation of Self-Service, Pre-registration System

Georgetown University selected Banner Student® from SunGard® to consolidate its student data processes and keep pace with changing demands. As part of this comprehensive undertaking, a new preregistration system was needed to both replicate business functionality in the legacy preregistration system, such as supporting different processes for the main campus and law school. “It was critical to have a single solution that would support both campuses to minimize upfront and maintenance costs and ensure redundancy of expertise across the registrars,” says John Pierce, University Registrar and Assistant Provost. Achieving these objectives required significant customizations to the Banner SIS.


Discovery:

“Because we needed to work as a combined unit but had different processes and policies to support, out-of-the-box solutions just didn’t work for us,” notes Denise Sangster, Law School Registrar. “We also had to avoid any major policy changes to be ready for April registrations. There was no time to buy and integrate something new. We had to customize what we had,” adds. “Fortunately, that’s when we met IData.”


Pierce and Sangster were introduced to IData by the University’s overall SIS Project Director Carrie Gillotte. Right from the first meeting, it became clear that IData truly understood the University’s needs and even suggested improvements such as integrating supplemental materials. Additionally, IData was committed to delivering the functionality needed by the deadline and at significantly lower cost than other alternatives.


Solution:

IData worked closely with Pierce and Sangster’s teams to customize Banner to meet stakeholder preregistration needs. The solution was designed, built and implemented in less than six months to deliver:


In addition to supporting the initial configuration and implementation, IData also produced end-user video tutorials which were helpful to staff, faculty and students alike. The IData team met with students and administrators to address questions and accept feedback, and made improvements along the way. When the main campus released its new system, IData was onsite to address any bugs. The law school roll-out followed on schedule and virtually bug free.


From the University’s perspective, IData attributes that were key to achieving a successful implementation were:


According to Pierce, IData and University staff functioned as a single, cohesive team. “We worked together to define outcomes and monitor the success of deliverables. IData always resolved issues with our deadlines in mind to ensure our constituents would not be affected.” Sangster adds that IData staff were available to address stakeholder issues at any time of day or night, and always with a positive attitude. “They did whatever they had to do,” Sangster recalls. “We can’t say enough good things about IData.”


Having worked with many different vendors during the course of transitioning to the new SIS (which is comprised of numerous third-party products and bolt-ons), Pierce’s assessment of the IData performance is: “excellent.” University staff were particularly appreciative of being kept informed, having confidence in IData’s commitments, and the “Yes, we can.” attitude. “I am very grateful for the services that we received from IData,” Pierce comments. “It would have been a huge problem for the University if they had not delivered – and they were working under a very tight timeframe. I cannot think of any way they could have performed better.”


Results:

The most significant benefit for the University of the IData engagement was being able to make a seamless transition to the new preregistration system on schedule and without issues. According to Pierce, because this application replaced a system that people had been using for a number of years, success can be measured by a lack of notice. “When you deliver what people are expecting, you usually don’t hear much about it,” Pierce concludes. “So this was a huge success because it was a non-event for the end user.”

For more information on the student-facing parts of the project, you can view Georgetown’s student preregistration video tutorial. IData prepared these training videos as part of the project.


PDF version of this case study: GU Preregistration Case Study (PDF)

University of Richmond - Data Cookbook Kirkwood Community College - Creating a Census Reporting Database Georgetown University - Implementation Services: Banner 8.x Upgrade Walden University: Data Migration Services Mount Holyoke College - Custom Software Development: Endowed Scholarship System Georgetown University - Custom Software Development: Preregistration System Columbus State University - Institutional Research College of Notre Dame of Maryland - IT Staff Augmentation Mount Holyoke College - Custom Software Development: Reunion System Longwood University - System Integration What makes IData different?